Legal Opinion
Pearson Ford Co. v. Ford Motor Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 1969No. Civ. 8874PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AULT, J. pro tem. *
Cross-defendant Ford Motor Company (Ford) appeals from a judgment requiring it to indemnify cross-complainant Pearson Ford Company (Pearson) for the entire judgment ($150,000) rendered in favor of plaintiffs Tessie G. Schultz and Leroy N. Schultz, and against both Ford and Pearson after a jury trial of the main action. Plaintiffs recovered in the main action for personal injuries sustained by Mrs. Schultz in a single car accident caused by a defect in the brake system of an automobile manufactured by Ford and sold to the plaintiffs by Pearson, an authorized Ford dealer.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Herrero v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- City & County of San Francisco v. Ho SingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Lan FrancoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Nest-KartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Williams MacHine & Tool Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.