Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hammer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1985No. 80-3-509PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This is a direct appeal from the entry of judgment of sentence of murder of the third degree against appellant Frederick Hammer arising from the death of an off-duty Philadelphia police officer, Charles Uffelman. The appellant alleges that the conduct of the trial judge in conducting extensive and repeated examination of witnesses, including the defendant, acted ofttimes in the role of advocate for the prosecution in violation of Commonwealth v. Myma, 278 *93Pa. 505, 123 A. 486 (1924) and exhibited incredulity of the defendant’s testimony in violation of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. GoosbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. RaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Goodheart v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Reimer v. TienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API