Legal Opinion

Boimare v. St. Geme

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 19, 1904No. 15,119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; John St. Paul, Judge. Action by Frank Boimare against Anatole St. Geme. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant and Albert Foureade, intervener, appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.

Plaintiff sued for the settlement of a partnership between him and the defendant, Anatole St. Geme, and prayed in that connection for a writ of sequestration, which was granted, and the property of the partnership was taken possession of by the sheriff under the writ.

The defendant filed an exception to dissolve the sequestration. The exception was overruled.

Albert Foureade intervened and claimed an interest as partner.

The defendant, St. Geme, .did not raise any special defense in his answer to plaintiff’s demand. He admitted in his answer that there had been, previous to the 1st of ■October,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vives v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  2. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  3. American Furniture Co. v. Grant-Jung Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  4. Yeager Milling Co. v. LawlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  5. Egan v. FushSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. FreySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Max Barnett Furniture Co. v. MartelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API