Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Mavis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 8, 2006No. 15-02-23725; A123045PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Wife has petitioned for reconsideration of our decision in this dissolution case, contending that we erred in affirming the trial court ruling that had denied her an award of attorney fees. She contends that we should have vacated the attorney fee decision on appeal in light of our decision to reverse and remand for reconsideration of the property award in the case. We agree with wife. We therefore modify our opinion by deleting the discussion of wife’s third assignment of error and replacing it with the following:

“In her third assignment of error, wife contends that the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of GarzaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of CirinaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. In Re the Marriage of WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. In re the Marriage of PollockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Balboa Apartments v. PatrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. In Re the Marriage of UhdeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API