Legal Opinion

Aetna Finance Co. v. Summers

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 29, 1982No. 80SC248PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Justice.

We granted certiorari to review Aetna Finance Co. v. Summers, Colo.App., 618 P.2d 726 (1980), which held that mailing a notice of default and consumer’s right to cure by certified mail, return receipt requested, is not proper notice to the debtor under the Colorado Consumer Credit Code when notice is returned to the creditor marked “unclaimed.” We affirm.

The facts in this case are undisputed. On July 7, 1978, the respondent, Dorothy Summers, executed and delivered a promissory note in the amount of $1,434.60, payable in thirty monthly installments to the petitioner, Aetna…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Werner v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  2. Breed v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  3. Aetna Finance Co. v. SummersColorado Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hassler v. Account Brokers of Larimer County, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  2. Ault v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Rosendale State Bank v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  4. Certif. From US for Ninth Cir. v. KachmanWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Cornhusker Casualty Insurance v. KachmanWashington Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API