Legal Opinion

Breed v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1882PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Gilpin County. The appellee obtained a verdict for the sum of $1,802.53, upon which, judgment was rendered. The. facts involved are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtElbert, C. J.

At the December term, 18^8, this case was before us upon the record of a previous trial, and was reversed upon two grounds: (1) Because the court below refused to allow the appellant to introduce in evidence two written contracts; and (2) because the court instructed the jury that Dawdey, as the agent of Breed, had implied authority to borrow money. 1 Col. 503.

Another trial was had, and the case is again before us for review upon numerous assignments of error.

The case presents (1) a question of agency, and (2) a question of the ratification of the unauthorized acts of the agent.

Notwithstanding…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. CowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keeves & Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Aetna Finance Co. v. SummersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. Rizzuto v. R. W. English Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. In re Disbarment of WalkeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  5. Nisbet v. Siegel-Campion Live Stock Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API