Legal Opinion

Aetna Finance Co. v. Summers

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1980No. 79CA1020PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYTE, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the trial court dismissing its complaint on a promissory note and security agreement. We affirm.

The facts as stated herein are undisputed. Defendant executed a note, with an acceleration clause, repayable to plaintiff in monthly installments. The note also contained a provision that plaintiff would acquire a security interest in certain household goods and furnishings described therein.

Defendant failed to make two consecutive payments on the note, whereupon plaintiff sent to defendant, by certified mail, return receipt requested, a notice of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  2. Werner v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  3. Exxon Corp. v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aetna Finance Co. v. SummersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Certif. From US for Ninth Cir. v. KachmanWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Cornhusker Casualty Insurance v. KachmanWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. M Life Insurance Co. v. Sapers & Wallace Insurance Agency, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Aetna Finance Co. v. SummersColorado Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API