Rosendale State Bank v. Schultz
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
Nancy and Fred Schultz appeal from a judgment of foreclosure and an order denying their motion to dismiss the action. The trial court rejected the Schultzes’ claim that the action should be dismissed because they did not receive notice of default and right to cure such default under sec. 425.104, Stats. We agree with the trial court that the Schultzes were not entitled to such a notice. Accordingly, we affirm.
On January 5, 1977, Nancy and Fred Schultz obtained a loan from the Rosendale State Bank in the amount of $17,500. To secure the loan, the Schultzes gave a mortgage on their residence.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Interest of IVCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
- Aetna Finance Co. v. SummersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
3Cited by10 opinions
- Beal v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2013
- Security Finance v. Brian KirschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- Boerner v. LVNV Funding LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019
- Bahena v. Jefferson Capital Sys., LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2019
- Nelson v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.