Boyle v. Moseley
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
After verdict for plaintiff, the trial judge, on defendant's motion, entered judgment non obstante. The sole question presented on plaintiff's appeal is whether in so doing error was committed. Plaintiff's ward, Beatrice Boyle, hereinafter called the plaintiff, was injured while riding as a guest in the automobile driven by defendant. If there was testimony tending to support plaintiff's claim that defendant was guilty of gross negligence or of wanton or wilful misconduct, which caused her injury, entry of judgment non obstante was erroneous. In passing upon the question presented, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Siesseger v. PuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Blood v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Neessen v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Kirby v. KeatingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Melby v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Stevens v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Willett v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Forsling v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.