Legal Opinion
United States v. QUANTITY OF EXTRACTS, BOTTLES, ETC.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided December 30, 1931No. 60PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRUM, District Judge.
Pursuant to the command of a search warrant issued by a commissioner, prohibition agents seized a quantity of extracts, bottles, barrels, kegs, oak chips, copper sheathing, copper pipe, solder, acid, ete. Thereafter, a libel was filed seeking the forfeiture thereof pursuant to section 25, title 2, National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 39), as property designed for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor intended for use in violation of said act.
M. Safer and B. Witten, as intervening claimants, move to quash the search warrant and to dismiss the libel, upon which motions the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Dodge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Strong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Albert C. Drebin, Budget Films, Inc., Lawrence S. Fine and Bruce M. VeneziaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Max ScharfmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- United States v. BurchDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.