Legal Opinion

United States v. Patrick Henry Earley

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1987No. 85-2673PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING EN BANC

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

The only issue in this appeal is whether a federal district judge who failed to state whether sentences he imposed were consecutive to or concurrent with a preexisting federal sentence may order, five months later and after the defendant was imprisoned, that the sentences were to be consecutive. The district judge described his later order as a “clarification ... to eliminate any ambiguity as to the Court’s intention.” R. I, 41.

Defendant, Patrick Henry Earley, was indicted on five counts and pleaded guilty in November 1984 to two counts of distributing…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. Michael M. Busic, United States of America v. Anthony LaroccaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Paul C. "Paulie" VillanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Dorothy JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. Carl P. FogelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Benjamin Thomas Tisdale, IIICourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. State v. HardestyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. HardestyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. United States v. Raymond Joseph LopezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API