Legal Opinion
United States v. Benjamin Thomas Tisdale, III
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 21, 1990No. 88-2354, 88-2689PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Defendant-appellant, Benjamin Tisdale, appeals his conviction for possession of firearms by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and his enhanced sentence to thirty years’ imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). He contends that (1) the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Sharrar v. FelsingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Norman D. Wright, United States of America v. George W. Kirby, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Thomas L. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Calvin B. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.