United States v. Jones
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW
BLOMMERS, Senior Judge:
This is another case remanded to us by the United States Court of Military Appeals for consideration of the constitutionality of provisions in a general regulation *729requiring members of the U.S. forces in the Republic of the Philippines (hereinafter the RP) to show possession or authorized disposition of tax-exempt property when directed to do so by cognizant authorities.*
I
We recently set forth our views about the constitutionality of the so-called “show and tell” provisions in these overseas merchandise control regulations in United States v.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. LeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. LumaguiU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990