Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Schmeding v. District Court of the Sixth Judicial District

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1937No. File No. 6454PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] W.J. Godwin commenced an action in the district court of Morton county, in which W.F. Schmeding, his counsel C. Liebert Crum, and B.W. Shaw, M.J. Tobin, A.F. Erberle, and E.B. Haight, a notary public, were made defendants, seeking to enjoin defendants from proceeding in a legislative contest.

The county of Morton constitutes the 30th senatorial district of the legislative assembly and is entitled to three members in the house of representatives. At the last…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Sherwood v. State Board of CanvassersNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Auditor General v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Madden v. Board of Election CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Olson v. BakkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Olson v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Andrews v. QuamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Kuhn v. BeedeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Kuhn v. BeedeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API