Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Schwartz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 2012No. 10-17726PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge NOONAN.

OPINION

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Courtney Crosby appeals the district court’s denial of his federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He raises three claims on appeal. First, Crosby challenges the California Court of Appeal’s conclusion that his waiver of his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial was valid. Second, he claims that the California court erred in finding that the trial court acted within its discretion to deny his subsequent attempt to withdraw the jury trial waiver. Finally, Crosby…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In re ColeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Davis v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  3. In re ColeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. James Ivins v. M. MartelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Marc Bryant v. Mike McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API