James Ivins v. M. Martel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Petitioner-Appellant James Allen Ivins appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his sentence as cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
Our review is governed by the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). Id. AEDPA restricts federal courts from granting a ha-beas writ to a petitioner in custody after a state court judgment on the merits unless the petitioner can show that the state court’s last reasoned…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Gonzalez v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Crosby v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ivins v. LizarragaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014