Legal Opinion
Marc Bryant v. Mike McDonald
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 1, 2014No. 12-16528UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Marc Anthony Bryant appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habe-as corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We affirm.
Bryant, an African-American, asserts that the district court erred when it denied habeas corpus relief on his claim that his confrontation 1 and due process 2 rights un der the United States Constitution were violated when the California state courts did not permit him to submit evidence that a witness had used a vile racial epithet when interviewed by the police. We disagree.
On this record, considering clearly established Supreme Court law, 3 we cannot say…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Savage v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017