Legal Opinion

Burgit v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1984No. Appeal, No. 954 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barry,

Before us is a petition for review of an order of respondent, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC), adopted December 3, 1982, and entered January 21, 1983. On September 16, 1981, intervenor Posten Taxi Company, Inc., (Posten) filed a complaint before the PUC against petitioner, Robert Burgit, t/d/b/a Bob Burgit City Limousine Service (Burgit). The complaint alleged, inter alia, that Burgit was not acting within the scope of the certificate granted to him by the PUC to operate a limousine service in the Wilkes-Barre area by the use of luxury-type vehicles without…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chappell v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. W. J. Dillner Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Ryan v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Ferry v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Purolator Security, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Limelight Limousine, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API