Estate of Inman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a decree determining heirship. Lillian Inman died intestate and without issue on July 30, 1954, leaving surviving her and entitled to succession her husband, one brother and two sisters. It was the position of the brother and sisters that all the estate was the separate property of decedent and that each of them under section 223 of the Probate Code was entitled to one-sixth, and the husband to one-half of it all, whereas it was the position of the husband that all the estate, with the exception of a piece of real property at 6233 Leona Street in Oakland,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Huth v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Dunn v. MullanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Callnon v. CallnonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bernatas v. HonnertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Cooke v. TsipouroglouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Petersen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
- Kershman v. KershmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Rody v. WinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.