Legal Opinion

State v. Whitman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1927No. File No. 6347PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MO'RIARTY, C.

The appellant, George Whitman, was convicted on a charge of having intoxicating liquor in his possession in a public place, and. he appeals from the judgment entered upon such conviction, and from an order denying a new trial.

The record shows the following facts: On April 20, 1924, a barber shop in the city of Burke was searched by officers, who found in a closet in the rear of the shop a bottle marked “Clover Blossom Toilet Water. Ai pleasing Face Lotion. 'Contains Grain Alcohol 50 per cent.” This bottle contained “Moonshine Whisky.” It is admitted that the defendant was the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. State v. HennessyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  4. People v. McClennegenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State v. KendallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State v. ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. KlueberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. BarrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API