Legal Opinion

Woolley v. Taylor

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1914No. 2586PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Son. Geo. G. Armstrong, Judge. Action by Edwin T. Woolley, administrator of the estate of Moses Davis, deceased, against Joseph E. Taylor, who died pending the action, which was revived against Alma 0. Taylor, and another, his executors. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

This action involves the ownership of real estate in Salt Lake City, of shares of the capital stock of the Utah or Utah-Idaho Sugar Company, and a few shares of the capital stock of an orchard company at Provo. ■ Moses Davis, a widower residing in Salt Lake City, had but one son, David J. Davis, and but one daughter, Rachel S. Davis, both of whom were over the age of twenty-one years. He purchased the real estate on the 13th of August, 1900. A warranty deed of conveyance was then made in his name and delivered to him. He took possession of the property, and, with his daughter, occupied it. On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Talbot v. TalbotSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1911
  2. McNally v. McAndrewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Calkins v. Equitable Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Bostwick v. MahaffyMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Boyle v. DinsdaleUtah Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chamberlain Etl Al. v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Controlled Receivables, Inc. v. HarmanUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Goodan v. GoodanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. LOSEE Et Ux. v. JONES Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Jackson v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API