Legal Opinion

Klinkert v. Streissguth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 1923No. 23,298PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action in the district court for Sibley county to recover $6,740.16. The case was tried before Tifft, J., who at the close of the testimony granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Plaintiff and defendant were next of kin and prospective heirs to the estate of Thomas Klinkert, consisting of real and personal property situated in Sibley county, the home and place of residence of Klinkert. Prior to his death and before any right or interest in or to his property became vested in either plaintiff or defendant, and on July 12, 1916, plaintiff by quitclaim deed conveyed and assigned and set over to defendant all and singular his prospective interest in and to the estate to accrue to him, both real and personal, for the consideration of $2,500; $1,500 thereof being paid at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. MyrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  2. McKnight v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Sheets v. RamerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Eder v. FinkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Liimatainen v. St. Louis River Dam & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Farmers Ins. Exchange v. ArltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Maguire v. MaguireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Jacobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Colby v. StreetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API