Legal Opinion
A Classic Time v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 2, 1997No. Nos. 97-1062, 97-1061, 97-1060, 97-1059, 97-1058, 97-1057, 97-1056 and 97-1054PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
A Classic Time, Branded Time Corp., Eastman Watch Co., F & K Watch Co,. Inc., Omni Quartz, Ltd., Aceutime Watch Corp., Delta Implex Watch Corp., and Anchor Time Corp. (collectively “Classic Time”) appeal the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, granting summary judgment for the United States. 942 F.Supp. 589 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1996). We affirm.
Background
The United States Customs Service required Classic Time to enter electrical timepieces under Schedule 7 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, instead of Schedule 6, despite several contrary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Bob Jones University v. SimonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Rollerblade, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Belfont Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- A Classic Time v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- ITG Voma Corp. v. United States International Trade CommissionUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017