Legal Opinion
Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank, F.S.B.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 25, 1990No. C8-89-1344PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
In an action brought under Minn.Stat. § 181.75, subd. 4 (1988) (authorizing a private cause of action against an employer who requests a polygraph test), First Minnesota Savings Bank (bank) appeals from a judgment entered following a jury verdict. The bank argues on appeal (a) the evidence was insufficient to award punitive damages to any of the respondents, (b) respondent Jodi Lynn Crace was not entitled to punitive damages without an accompanying award of compensatory damages, (c) the Crace claim was improperly consolidated with the claims of respondents Terrence…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Homer v. GuzulaitisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Piekarski v. Home Owners Savings Bank, F.S.B.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Benner v. Saint Paul Public Schools, I.S.D. 625District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991