Legal Opinion

Bast v. Bast

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1923No. 5,202PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. COMMISSIONER ROSE

prepared the opinion for the court.

The appeal now before this court is from an order vacating and annulling a temporary restraining order and denying a permanent injunction. The plaintiff and appellant instituted this action to restrain the sheriff of Fergus county from selling certain lands at execution sale. The essential facts in the case are as follows: The plaintiff acquired title to the *73lands involved herein under the homestead laws of the United States, after which the respondent Edna M. Bast procured a decree of divorce from him on the ground of extreme cruelty,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cole v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Beecher v. Wilson, Burns & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1888
  3. Kane v. KaneMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Robinson v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Emery v. EmeryMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Roman v. AlbertMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Nelson v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Humbird v. ArnetMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Shaw v. ShawMontana Supreme Court · 1949

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API