Legal Opinion
Atkins v. Bouchet
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 25, 1927No. Docket No. 5825PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturteyant, J.
The plaintiff brought an action to recover damages for personal injuries. The defendants answered and a trial was had in the trial court. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. From a judgment based thereon the defendants have appealed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.
This is the second appeal. (65 Cal. App. 94 [223 Pac. 87].) The facts are so fully stated in the reported case that we need not restate them. On the second trial the plaintiff testified, and also demonstrated, that she did not pause at the corner “one or two minutes” of sixty seconds each. She…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Palmer v. TschudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Arnold v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal RailwaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Everett v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Mayer v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Collins v. California Street Cable R.R. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Overacker v. Key SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Jacobsen v. VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Metzler v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929