Legal Opinion

R.O. Corp. v. John H. Bell Iron Mountain Ranch Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1989No. 89-56PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

This is an appeal from an award of damages to appellee John H. Bell Iron Mountain Ranch Company on the basis of the unjust enrichment of appellant R.O. Corporation for permitting its livestock to run at large on the unfenced pastures of appellee.

We reverse.

Appellant presents the following issues ' for our consideration:

I

Did the trial court commit error by awarding damages under an equitable theory 'of unjust enrichment when a specific rule of law prohibits those damages?

II

If unjust enrichment does apply, did the trial court use the proper measure of damages?

Appellee commenced…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cosfriff Bros. v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Bereman v. BeremanWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Doud v. First Interstate Bank of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Thatcher & Sons, Inc. v. Norwest Bank Casper, N.A.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Rocky Mountain Turbines, Inc. v. 660 Syndicate, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Adkins v. LawsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Braunstein v. Robinson Family Ltd. Partnership LLPWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Bowles v. Sunrise Home Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Clark v. GaleWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API