Legal Opinion

Neff v. Johnson Memorial Hospital

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 7, 2006No. AC 25321PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

In this appeal, the plaintiff, Benjamin Neff, claims that the trial court improperly rendered summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Johnson Memorial Hospital (hospital), on the grounds that (1) no genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether *536the hospital negligently credentialed Thomas Hanny, a physician, and (2) expert testimony was required to establish the standard of care for the claim of negligent credentialing.1 We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following factual and procedural history is pertinent to our discussion of the issues…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Petriello v. KalmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Boone v. William W. Backus HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. LePage v. HorneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brookins Ex Rel. Gotcher v. MoteMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Grassie v. Roswell Hospital Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Frigo v. Silver Cross Hosp. and Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Vanliner Insurance v. FayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. D'Angelo Development & Construction Corp. v. CordovanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API