Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Future Ford Sales
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 26, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 92-122 MMSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
Defendants have moved for summary judgment on plaintiffs claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), as well as on plaintiffs two supplemental state law claims. Docket Item [“D.I.”] 62. In the first count of his amended complaint, plaintiff alleges retaliatory discharge under the FLSA. D.I. 16 at ¶¶ 17, 19 citing 29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(3) (1988). In his second and third counts, he alleges breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing under Delaware law. D.I. 16 at ¶¶ 25, 31. This Court has jurisdiction over the FLSA claim under 28…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Palladino ex rel. United States v. VNA of Southern New Jersey, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Cross v. Bally's Health & Tennis Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Randolph v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Stewart v. Masters Builders Ass'n of KingDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2010
- Palladino Ex Rel. US v. VNA OF SOUTHERN NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999