Legal Opinion
Randolph v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 24, 2010No. Civil Action DKC 2009-1790PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending and ready for resolution in this case is a motion to dismiss (Paper 9) filed by Defendant ADT Security Services, Inc. The issues are fully briefed and the court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6, no hearing being deemed necessary. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s motion to dismiss will be denied.
I. Background
Plaintiffs Sharon Randolph and Tami Thompson were employed by Defendant ADT Security Services, Inc. (“ADT”) from December 1, 2008 until April 2009. (Paper 12 ¶ 9, 38). Plaintiffs are both Maryland…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Francis v. GiacomelliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. Rapid Response Delivery, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- Donovan v. Alfred Hospitality, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Fisher v. Bae Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- Weisel v. Kaimetrix, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020