Sampson v. Vann
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Candler, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The question presented by the writ of error is whether or not the trial judge erred in allowing the intervention over the objection urged thereto. We think that he did.
The plaintiff’s case is one at law to recover a judgment for the amount of principal and interest alleged to be due her by the defendant on a promissory note, and this is true notwithstanding the fact that the petition contained a prayer that the judgment be declared a special lien upon the property described in a deed which the defendant had executed and delivered to her as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Delaney v. SheehanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Edenfield v. Bank of MillenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Burgess v. Ohio National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Carlton v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Potts v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Potter's Properties, LLC v. Vns Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Todd v. ConnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. BagwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Pico, Inc. v. MickelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Carswell v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.