Edenfield v. Bank of Millen
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Millen — Judge Jones. September 24, 1909.
1Opinion of the CourtBussell, J.
The Bank of Milieu obtained a verdict and judgment against the plaintiffs in error, upon certain promissory notes. General exception is taken to the judgment, and error is specially assigned upon certain ridings anteceding the final judgment, and which necessarily controlled it. The defendant demurred to the plaintiff’s petition, and also filed a plea to the jurisdiction. The demurrer was overruled, and the plea to the jurisdiction was stricken on motion; and error is assigned upon these rulings. The verdict and judgment contain a. fin ding against the defendants for attorney’s fees. We find…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coleman v. Slade & EtheridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Bush v. Bank of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Baskins v. Valdosta Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Marshall v. CharlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Bennett v. McConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
3Cited by21 opinions
- Security Mortgage Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Burgess v. Ohio National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Dixon v. BondCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Rogers v. McKinleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.