Legal Opinion
Carswell v. Cannon
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 23, 1964No. 40667, 40668PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
The jurisdictional issue raised in the lower couit cannot be resolved on this appeal as the exception involving the issue has been made by one who seeks to intervene in the case and who in that capacity must take the case as she finds it. Charleston & W. C. R. Co. v. Pope & Fleming, 122 Ga. 577 (1) (50 SE 374); Seaboard A. L. R. v. Knickerbocker Trust Co., 125 Ga. 463 (54 SE 138); Love v. Goodson, 150 Ga. 46 (1) (102 SE 429); Fountain v. Bryan, 176 Ga. 31 (3) (166 SE 766); Elliot v. Macauley, 177 Ga. 96 (1) (169 SE 358). It is not within the intervenor’s province to urge…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Blakewood v. Yellow Cab CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. Pope & FlemingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Delaney v. SheehanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Davis v. WardeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gregory v. TenchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. BagwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. BougasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976