Legal Opinion

Petro v. North Coast Villas Ltd.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 2000No. C.A. No. 19618PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whitmore, Judge.

Appellant, Auditor of State Jim Petro, has. appealed from a judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas denying his application for enforcement of various subpoenas duces tecum. This court reverses and orders that the subpoenas be enforced.

I

On September 28, 1998, Auditor of State Jim Petro (“State Auditor”) served several subpoenas duces tecum on North Coast Villas Limited, Step II Management and Development Corporation, The V Companies, and The Voinovich Companies, Inc. (collectively referred to as “defendants”). Those subpoenas were issued in the furtherance of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Akron-Canton Waste Oil, Inc. v. Safety-Kleen Oil Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Castlebrook, Ltd. v. Dayton Properties Ltd. PartnershipOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Kneisley v. Lattimer-Stevens Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ohio Elections Commission v. Ohio Chamber of CommerceOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. Abi-AazarOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Ministerial Day Care Ass'n v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. J.P. v. M.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp. v. SalkinOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API