Legal Opinion

Ohio Elections Commission v. Ohio Chamber of Commerce

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 2004No. 03AP-1121 and 03AP-1137PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Watson, Judge.

{¶ 1} Citizens for a Strong Ohio (“CSO”) and the Ohio Chamber of Commerce (“Ohio Chamber”) appeal from the decision of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas enforcing two subpoenas issued by the Ohio Elections Commission during proceedings before it. 1 Alliance for Democracy (“Alliance”) also appeals from the trial court’s decision denying its motion to intervene. 2 For the following reasons, we affirm.

{¶ 2} The case arose from a series of advertisements run by the Ohio Chamber and CSO during the 2000 campaign for election of Supreme Court of Ohio justices. Relators filed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. McConnell v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Russo v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. Paramount Land Holdings, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Cleveland v. Bryce Peters Fin. Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State ex rel. Cordray v. Tri-State Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Cleveland v. Paramount Land Holdings, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Cleveland v. Amazing Tickets, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API