Legal Opinion
Greyerbiehl v. Hughes Electric Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1923No. 231PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, District Judge.
By writ of certiorari issued from this court, petitioner, plaintiff below, challenges the jurisdiction of the District Court for the District of North Dakota to make an order, dated March 27, 1922, vacating the verdict and j udgment and granting a new trial in a cause therein pending between the parties hereto. The chronology of the case is important to a correct understanding of the questions before this court.
Trial of the case was had at the regular March, 1920, term, and verdict and judgment entered December 23, 1920. Stay of 42 days was granted “within which to move…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hyde v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Phillips v. NegleySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Foster-Milburn Co. v. Knight, Chief JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Kanatser v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Frankel v. WoodroughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Gilmore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co. v. MolyneauxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.