Legal Opinion

Unnamed Attorney v. Attorney Grievance Commission

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 21, 2009No. 57 September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBERA, Judge.

Appellant, a practicing attorney and member of the Maryland Bar, is currently under investigation by appellee, the Attorney Grievance Commission (“Commission”), concerning the handling of Appellant’s attorney trust account. 1 Pursuant to the investigation, Bar Counsel, acting on behalf of the Commission, filed a subpoena seeking documents from the attorney and the bank at which the account is maintained.

Appellant filed with the Circuit Court for Baltimore City a “Motion of Objection to Enforcement of Subpoena” and requested a hearing on the motion. The Commission filed a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Fowler v. Printers II, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Metheny v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Unnamed Attorney v. Attorney Grievance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Maryland State Board of Physicians v. EistCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Maryland State Board of Physicians v. EistCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API