State v. Lambert
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant brings forward only one assignment of error. He contends that the trial court erred in attaching the recommendation for restitution or reparation as a condition of work release or parole. G.S. 148-33.2(c) requires a judge, upon sentencing to consider whether restitution or reparation should be imposed as a condition of attaining work release. He must indicate his decision on the order committing defendant to custody. G.S. 148-57.1(c) governs restitution or reparation as a condition of parole and is almost identical to the provisions of G.S. 148-33.2(c).
Defendant first…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Herman L. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. SimmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. KillianCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. GallamoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Dorothy M. Alexander v. Walter T. Johnson Jane G. Greenlee Joy J. Johnson Wymene Valand Henry W. Oxedine James WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Smith v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. ArnetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. WingateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002