Legal Opinion
Smith v. Wilkins
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided July 2, 1985No. 8413SC756PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Petitioner presents two questions for review: (i) is G.S. 20-9(f) unconstitutional on its face, and (ii) is G.S. 20-9(f) unconstitutional as applied to him? Petitioner contends that G.S. 20-9(f) denies him equal protection of the laws and violates his fundamental right to travel. We disagree.
*485General Statute 20-9(f) provides:
The Division shall not issue a driver’s license to any person whose license or driving privilege is in a state of cancellation, suspension or revocation in any jurisdiction, if the acts or things upon which the cancellation, suspension or revocation in such…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zobel v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Yan-Min Wang v. Unc-Ch School of MedicineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Matter of BelkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Barringer v. Caldwell County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Heying v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Belk v. State ex rel. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.