Legal Opinion
Steele v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 28, 1913No. 8588PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Before Sease, J., Florence, Fall term, 1912. Action by W. M. Steele against Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co. Defendant appeals. cites: 57 Neb. 534; Pom. Code R., Secs. 335, 340, 350; 67 S. C. 499. cite: 55 S. C. 90; 79 S. C. 438; 64 C. C. A. 548; 68 S. C. 55; 67 S. C. 499; 41 Am. R. 182; 166 U. S. 521; 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 675; 82 N. E. 705; 75 Fed. 691; 100 S. W. 551; 25 N. E. 799; 39 S. W. 695; 85 Pac. 230.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fraser.
In the argument of appellant there is the following statement of its case:
“This is a suit for damages alleged to have resulted from personal injuries to plaintiff, a switchman and car coupler, while in the discharge of his duties, on the 23d day of December, 1911, in the Florence yards of Atlantic Coast Dine Railroad Company. The complaint alleges the bruising, breaking and maiming of plaintiff’s left hand and wrist. It further alleges that the injury was caused by the negligence and wrongful acts of defendant in several particulars,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hines v. JarrettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pendleton v. Columbia Ry., G. E. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Hollifield v. KellerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- Tate v. Claussen-Lawrence Const. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
- Crowe v. Domestic Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Boyd v. MaxwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.