Legal Opinion
Tate v. Claussen-Lawrence Const. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 7, 1933No. 13576PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Bonham.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the destruction by fire of his garage and filling station building situate at Calhoun Falls in Abbeville County, through the alleged joint and concurrent negligence, willfulness, and wantonness of the defendants. The garage and filling station were occupied by McEanahan Brothers, under a contract from Gulf Refining Company, who were lessees from Dr. Tate, the owner thereof. The building was situate at the intersection of Savannah and Depot Streets. The complaint states the alleged…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. ParkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Matthews v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Pendleton v. Columbia Ry., G. E. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Sams v. ArthurSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- McNeill v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lumber Mutual Casualty Ins. Co. v. StukesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Gulf Refining Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Texas Co. v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
- Vance Trucking Company v. Canal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
- Szantay v. Beech Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.