Legal Opinion
Rupert v. United States
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 15, 2004No. CIV.A 1:CV-03-0421PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
We are considering Plaintiffs’ motion to compel the United States to release redacted portions of a memorandum prepared by an Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Appeals Officer. (Doc. 15). On August 11, 2004, we issued an order requiring that the government submit “to the court a complete and unmarked copy of the memorandum for in camera inspection.” Rupert v. United States, 2004 WL 2110383 at *3, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17899 at *8 (M.D.Pa.2004). The government complied with the order, and we must now decide whether the deliberative process privilege and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of the Army of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020