Legal Opinion

People v. Toal

California Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1890No. 20,610PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Los Angeles County; J. W. McKinley, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

FOOTE, C.

The defendant was convicted of an assault with intent to commit murder. From the judgment of conviction, an order overruling his motion in arrest of judgment, and an order denying his motion for a new trial he appeals. The order overruling the motion in arrest of judgment is not itself appealable by the defendant, but may be reviewed on his appeal from the judgment: People v. Majors, 65 Cal. 100, 3 Pac. 401.

The main point relied on by the defendant seems to be that the police court of the city of Los Angeles, before the judge of which his preliminary examination was had, and by whose…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kalloch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. People v. Shem Ah FookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Brooks v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Ex parte Ah YouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. People v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re ClohertyWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People v. ToalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Ex parte ReillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API