Legal Opinion

Ex parte Reilly

California Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1890No. 20681PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

Petitioner was arrested, tried, and convicted upon a charge of battery alleged to have been committed in the city of Los Angeles. The trial took place before a justice of the peace who styles himself ex officio police judge of the city of Los Angeles, and who appears to have been acting as such police judge by designation of the mayor, in pursuance of the so-called Whitney act, which it was intimated in the first decision in People v. Toal, 23 Pac. Rep. 203, applied to the city of Los Angeles. The claim of petitioner is, that his imprisonment is illegal, because, under the freeholders’…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ToalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex parte GiamboniniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Ex parte ThomasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1907
  3. Ex parte ThomasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API