Legal Opinion

Pottash v. Albany Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1922No. Appeal, No. 351PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opínion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Plaintiffs issued a foreign attachment under which the sheriff seized several carloads of goods, being transported by the Pennsylvania Bailroad Company under a negotiable bill of lading which was in the possession of the Fourth Street National Bank. The railroad and the bank were both served with copies of the attachment, and *386duly appeared to the action. Plaintiffs’ claim is that the bank holds the bill for defendant.

The railroad company entered a rule to show cause why the attachment should not be quashed, because plaintiffs had not complied with section 24 of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Byers & Davis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  2. Van Swartow v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
  3. McGowin v. RemingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
  4. Hurst v. BrennenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Bergman v. StrausSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Watson AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Premier Cereal & Beverage Co. v. Pennsylvania Alcohol Permit BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. American Trust Co. v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. International Bedding Co. v. Terminal Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  5. Konopka Et Ux. v. McAteerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API