Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Department of Revenue

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1975No. 404PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The appellants contend, due to the representation of the woman at the commission to the effect that she would file the petition, and due to the appellants’ allegedly justifiable reliance to their detriment upon such representation, that the department is estopped from asserting the untimeliness of the filing of the petition.

We hold that estoppel is inappropriate here because: (1) It is being asserted against the government, and (2) the appellants have failed to establish justifiable reliance on the representation.

With respect to the fact that estoppel is being asserted against the government,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cudahy v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Brachtl v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Monahan v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. City of Jefferson v. EifflerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sunnyview Village, Inc. v. Department of AdministrationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Reliance Insurance Co. v. Public Service CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Shopper Advertiser, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Beane v. City of Sturgeon BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State Law Enforcement Standards Board v. Village of Lyndon StationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API