Brachtl v. Department of Revenue
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The taxpayer’s (appellant’s) position is a simple one. He concludes that sec. 227.16 (1), Stats., which sets forth the procedural requirements for an appeal or review of a decision and order of the Wisconsin Tax Appeals Commission does not require that there be a service of the petition for review on the Tax Appeals Commission in addition to the service on the State Department of Revenue.
Sec. 227.16 (1), Stats., in its pertinent parts reads as follows:
“. . . Proceedings for review shall be instituted by serving a petition therefor . . . upon the agency . . . and by filing such petition in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Monahan v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Bublitz v. MatulisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by27 opinions
- Cruz v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Sunnyview Village, Inc. v. Department of AdministrationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Cudahy v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Shopper Advertiser, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State Department of Transportation v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.