Legal Opinion

Hyland v. St. Mark's Hospital

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1967No. 10498PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice.:

Plaintiff, Leonard Hyland, sued for injuries suffered while being catheterized by an orderly in the defendant St. Mark’s Hospital. In response to interrogatories a jury answered that the defendant was not negligent and judgment was entered accordingly. Thereafter, pursuant to the. plaintiff’s motion alternatively for a judgment n. o. v. or a new trial, the court stated that: “Judgment notwithstanding the verdict is granted pursuant to Rule 50(b)” and ordered: “Judgment is hereby entered for the plaintiff and against the defendant on the question of negligence and it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. LindenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Keogh v. MauldingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. King v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Wellman v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. TrujilloUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Goddard v. HickmanUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lembach v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API