Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Newton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 17, 1989No. 89-28PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This is an automobile accident case. The jury returned a verdict in favor of appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Parrish, and awarded them a total of $5,300 in damages. The Parrishes filed a motion for a new trial, claiming evidentiary errors and an inadequate verdict, which the court denied. Finding no error, we affirm.

The accident happened April 14, 1987, on Highway 68 in Springdale. Appellee Charles Newton was driving his father’s car. While attempting to enter Highway 68 from a side road, Charles pulled out in front of the Parrish car, causing the accident.

The Parrishes sued…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Amos v. StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  3. Oxford v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Fields v. StovallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Bell v. Estate of BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Cluck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  5. McMullin v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API