Fields v. Stovall
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The sole point of appeal is the alleged inadequacy of a jury verdict. A car wreck occurred when the appellee, the defendant below, ran a stop sign and struck the appellant’s car. The jury returned a verdict which awarded the full amount of claimed property damage, but only a part of the claimed medical expenses and nothing for lost wages, mental anguish, or future medical expenses. The trial court denied appellant’s motion for a new trial. We affirm the trial court’s ruling.
Under ARCP Rule 59(a)(5), the inadequacy of the recovery can be a ground for a new trial. When…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Warner v. LiebhaberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Raiborn v. RaibornSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
3Cited by6 opinions
- Younts v. Baldor Elec. Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Kempner v. SchulteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Knoles v. SalazarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Fritz v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- Parrish v. NewtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.